Scharding and Warren (2023) provide a compelling implementation of Scanlon’s (1998) contractualism. Their intersubjective reflection (IR) process is an especially clear map for applying contractualism to actual workplace conflicts, demanding empathy with specific stakeholders and their unique perspectives. However, they do not address the related problem of epistemic injustice/oppression. Any ethical theory based on intersubjective reflection should be attentive to systemic forces that unfairly render some subjective experiences less credible than others. With greater attention to systems of knowledge, IR can better meet its potential as a go-to theory in business ethics.